/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2584927
>>2585268
I just need to ask one thing here. Not that anon, but can you give me one example of "cartoon/anime porn that has the "fundamentals" correctly" and in fact something that is made into a big deal for say: Hentai animators, Doujin illustrators, etc, etc? Cuz unless you cannot, this makes me think that this "fundamentals is the ONLY WAY" talk is horseshit, when it seems 99% of hentai is exaggerated nonsense, e.i: Kanojo x Kanojo x Kanojo, Taimanin Asagi, Bible Black, and many upon many of Doujins out there?
Pic related. I feel there IS a need to understand basic anatomic features of the human body, obviously, to make sure what you're trying to draw LOOK right how it's supposed to look. But if hentai is anything to judge (and this is what the mass majority of cartoon/animated porn likes), it's always NEVER like real life/irl porn. It's clearly exaggerated on purposed BECAUSE it's not real, it's fiction. So instead of just making drawn porn look just like real porn, Japanese artists make exceptions that still fits the field of "fundamentals" as it should.

tl;dr: Case in point, is this "know your fundamentals" for just to understand it in basics, or is this shilling "fundamentals faggot, git gud" just to bash artists if you're not top pro in muh fundamentals?