/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4509321
>>4509322
It's just disgusting though. It's not even, as art usually did, portaying an ugly subject in a sublime manner... (see: Otto dix, the war) It's the artist's own egocentrism shown in all its disfigured inflation

It's peak post-modernism. Where art doesn't tell anything about the inherent divinity of nature or in the subject it illustrates but just a way for the artist to "express" his own deviancy.
It's the very anthesis of Gustav Klimt. I'm saying this because,in a way, they're very similar in the way they drew faces and bodies, but the internal value of each artist shines through the end product

On the left, an appreciation for the eternal feminine
On the right, a disgusting pervert who needs to shows the world his inner ugliness