/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4231993
Sure, his "critique" isn't really fair, but the unfortunate part of trying to critique a work like yours is that it just lacks "fundamentals". If your goal with this was to copy the reference accurately, it doesn't look like you took the steps to copy it accurately. I said earlier in the thread:
>I feel like the best way you're going to learn is by doing it right the first time and not skipping over parts or being lazy.
Which the drawing you did clearly shows elements of being lazy. If he's using a dildo, how come the balls on it are flat? How come his dick is flat? Why does the mask stretch all the way across his face even though you can see the side of his head where it should attach?
>Y'all crabs can't give me resources to improve and give everyone else resources.
This is such a defeatist argument. You claim no one has given you resources when the first thing everyone is told is to "read the sticky", which gives you plenty of resources to start out with.
>I won't improve if you won't help me.
This is completely untrue. Why are you entrusting your improvement as an artist into the hands of a bunch of retarded people on an anonymous imageboard? Shouldn't the only person you can trust and the only person who is in charge of your improvement be you? I sure as hell wouldn't trust retards on here who don't give a fuck about me to help me.
>>4232001
>Yeah I draw anime not real people.
I know that you're probably trolling, but this is a shitty argument, because anime people are literally based off of real people. Even this retarded reaction picture of an anime character I am posting has some basis in proportions of real life people. The bottom of his ear matches up with the bottom of his nose, above his eyes half of his head is forehead. Also, maybe I'm retarded, but isn't your reference image a real person, or is it an anime picture? Either way, I can assure you if it is an anime picture, the artist has some basic understanding of drawing real life people.