/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5060777
>I'll believe this delusional bullshit when propaganda, advertisements, and theologic texts stop influencing people
You cannot assume that one type of media equals another. Advertisements aren't even as effective across different industries, much less effective across all industries, peoples, languages, and at the same level of effectiveness. Vaguely implying that "this one type of media influences people sometimes in very small ways so therefore this other completely different type of media must be just as if not even more effective at influencing completely different people in infinitely larger ways" is not how sociology works. We've had violence and rape and all sorts of taboo in media literally for as long as there has been media and we cannot consistently demonstrate that creation or consumption of media causes negative actions or consistently positively correlates with it.
> When psychiatrists tell alcoholics to go write fantasies about being drunk, instead of "avoid at all costs."
First, you're making the assumption that people who view lolicon are already pedophiles or have some desire to fuck real kids and that the consumption of loli is equivalent to consumption of CP by a pedo or alcohol by an alcoholic
Secondly, the advice isn't "avoid at all costs". The advice is to minimize contact, create a support network, and to figure out why the alcoholic has issues with drinking. Regular people can drink just fine without spiraling like alcoholics do.
>When they can admit that the idea itself is potentially harmful enough that it deserves to be locked in the furthest vault away from the mainstream's psyche possible
Can you demonstrate that the idea is harmful? Do you have any meta-analysis that demonstrate that over multiple studies and multiple populations that correlation of loli, or even CP if we don't have studies of loli, causes or correlates with harm to children in the future? If you don't then you're talking out of your ass
>>5060785
Post proof

>>4399019
>make friends
>share work
>read books
>do exercises
>personal projects

vs

>just COOOOOM

>>4107290
>let's ban things I don't like

>>4075824
I don't think you understand what a discount is, nigger. It doesn't involve you actually lowering your prices at any point. You pick some IPs you like in terms of aesthetic and characterdesign and so on and price your commissions for those IPs at the level you would like to be paid. Then you add 20% on top of that price for everything else to make the regular pricing look like a bargain.

Can I build a fanbase on Newgrounds only posting traditional art? I really hate Twitter and Instagram. I noticed though that pretty much all the art I see on there is digital, so I'm not sure. Also tell my how you feel about the site for art other than my own questions

>>3577558

>>3572870
you're clearly doing music wrong if you think it's two things at once. you're supposed to use the music, not fight against it. i wouldn't listen to a sports match if it wasn't relevant to what i was trying to do. the same goes for music.

or maybe just chill the fuck out. some people work better at half attention. human brains are not all the same and i guarantee you don't know how to use yours even remotely effectively. telling people "this is how it is" when the subject is individual brains and personal workflow is absolutely ridiculous.

>>3422598
composition is the final result from the artist working out problems within the picture frame. there are no fucking tutorials just like there are no tutorials on how to life live. suck it up and realize you have to use your brain.

>>3316036
he can paint it for a gallery and it still not be fine art. it isn't as contextually simple as you think it is.

>>3223579
troll go home.

>>3186062
>not knowing composition far outweighs correct anatomy
>NGMI
go meme another board.

>>3065364
>mental blocks dont exist
>therefore he must not like drawing!

>>3058800
>>3058728
>>3058722
and here are the idiots shitting up the thread with irony.

>>2528722
trying to hide your final submission banana?

>>1592017
>What is learning the fundamentals before breaking rules on purpose.