/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>1956109
>Assumptions make an ass out of you and me.
People still use this? I thought that was like some cheesy 90's saying.

The structures are all coming off as roughly the same size even though they're obviously farther in the distance. I'd suggest giving them the idea that this landscape is even grander. Do that buy scaling down the structures. Unless you want those background structures to stay that size. If so, scale up the ones closer to us.
Also disperse them in a way that they're not so predictable. What I mean by this is there's a nearly even spacing between every single one of them. It causes a subconscious tangent of sorts. Space them out so there isn't an equal spacing and it'll look better.

As >>1853046 said, because of the shape of these structures, it making your eye want to go off the page. This can be prevented by having the right most structure sized up and putting it closer to us so we only see it's middle section on the top right of the pic. Accomplishing three things: breaking up the shape of the cloud, giving us scale and depth.
The rest of those structures you'll have to figure out yourself if you take the advice I mentioned earlier on. But basically the left structures help point towards the fox (your focal point) and the ones to the right don't. So figure something out with that.

I like firefox. Especially it's tail. I think you did a nice job with that.

Figure out something with the foreground that helps lead out eye to the fox. The smaller structures in the foreground are nice but make sure you repeat them in the middleground and so on.