/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7142990
>can't argue against anything
>unable to stay objective
>makes an absurdist statement and a strawman
>shoots the messenger
And there you go

>>7019550
>>7019626
Something tells me this "big epic troll" of yours is nothing but damage control.

If you wanted this to be a true troll, you could've acted coy and drop even more misleading information just so you put everyone spinning in circles with the false hope of reaching you, all while silently giggling like a bitch among your equally bitchy peers.
Instead, you simply cut the thing short on the spot saying "it was all fake gegegege" without a punchline or a gotcha moment, which leds me to believe you just want people to believe you didnt get doxxed at all when you actually did.

This is retarded and anyone who partakes in this bullshit beyond this point is part of the problem, now start posting and redrawing OCs, you imbeciles.

>>6966419
>uhhh we didnt say it like that your just insecureeee
Sure, and I was born yesterday. Dont be ridiculous.
You just dont read words the way you find it convenient to you depending on some psychological mumbo jumbo, that's not how communication works. The tone of voice is placed specifically to drive the tone or mood of the idea we communicate influenced by how it's worded, whether it's casual, formal, friendly, or -in this case- condescending.

Saying something like "Trendy characters give free followers, you should try drawing them" is not the same as saying something like "Surely you wont miss the free followers from drawing Trendy characters, right?" despite of the objective of the messages being pretty much the same because the tone of voice is shifted from encouraging to condescending.
And that is for this example alone, but when it comes to this topic as a whole, this condescending and petty nature is all over the place and it shows for the way you faggots word yourselves.

>this thread again, yet again, again.
Remember to not fall to obvious baits, newfags

>>6920536
>>6928126
>>6928138
People get too worried about doxxing as if they had anything to be doxxed for or were worth a dox at all.
I was doxxed from people of my own country that got a lot of compromising information and thought it would be funny to screw me over... and yet nothing came out of it because, lo and behold, people who dox literal nobodies on the internet are socially inept idiots with the sense of malice of an middle schooler.
>>6928282
gt or didnt happen.

>>6897777
>lol. i am an artist you braindead retard.
That has to be the biggest lie you have said in this whole ordeal, Tripita.
>and i'm saying many of these would already have passed.
>because the average consumer actually has no idea what they want and they WILL often accept changes if your changes are better than their own design.
You really have not dealt with clients before, have you? I have, in three different work fields. It is true that some clients accept more than they should when it comes to design choices, or that they are easily convinced by changes, but that is because you already delivered most of the design choices as they expected you to do, what are some small changes here and there? Some clients dont mind, some others do.
Now, if you spit them something that looks nothing alike to what they asked, much like every single slop of that flame goblin, they WILL confront you about it. You really are delusional if you think people are going to stay shut about not getting what they wanted when money is on the table.
>i'll give it a shot starting around now so you're free to judge then.
Whatever you are supposed to be doing, you have aleady said it several times, for what purpose?
>another smiley face
Tripita, I know you're mad, but please, dont be so blatant about it, it's makes me feel kind of bad.

>>6829131
Upon reading this i realized this fag is full of shit
>no. i'm saying it's better than what permabegs like you are capable of even at your best.
>you have nothing to contribute or create so you only see AI as a threat instead of a tool.
This is like the devil trying to bargain for your soul by trying to make you feel shit about yourself
>"You suck anyway and you're shit, so just use ai!"
Fucking ultimate king of the crabs here
Boil yourself, crustacean

>>6820887
I always find funny how people make so much emphasis on the "dick sucking" part or some shady practices when I've found success with my own methods without being some big artist's pet.

If you want to degrade your image doing some shady stuff or humiliate yourself just for some breadcrumbs of advertisement while believing there's simply no other way around, more power to ya, you're the one stuck at low numbers for a reason.

>disguised /pol/fag bitching thread
Hide.

>>6797620
Do you have any actual examples of what you described on the artists that were mentioned itt or are you just parroting the same "durr all big artists bad because ego and shit" arguments and hoping it works on these people as well?

I dont deny some big artists are genuine assholes, but not only some arent and small artists can be as well, to crusade them in social circles the same way leftoids crusade rich people because dumb "rich people bad" arguments is being too stupid about it. You're still looking for excuses to viscerally hate on people that have done nothing to you or anyone of worth for that matter

>>6790218
This whole debacle is just aifags jerking themselve off by being proud of pics they didnt make against an anon that draws, all happening in an art board, where people draw.
You dont prompt, let alone draw, /ic/ does not welcome AI generated art, you have /g/, /h/ and god knows what other board for that, but not /ic/
Begone, already.

And you faggots also stop feeding this trash of a thread.

>30 replies in 30 minutes
This is going to hit bump limit, isnt it?
>Captcha:S4GRW

can we make this thread hit bump limit already? or can we report this guy bumping the thread needlessly? Autosage? Anything?

This board is weird.
>Nooo!! Why are people charging so low for their draws! It's the third worlders fault for charging so little!!
>Nooooo!! Why are you charging so high?! Your art isnt even worth 5$!!!
Make up your damn minds, for fuck sake.

>>6760592
>"drawing is autistic and it takes too much time"
>proceeds to spend an entire week on a single piece by overcomplicating the process of it
Idiot.

>>6747010
Shut the fuck up, what (you) did was embarrass yourself in front of a crowd in behalf of no one. I'd be damned if I let someone like (you) speak for me on whatever the topic is.

I may be a small artist, smaller than you even, but Im not a whiny little shit like (you), for I know how to play the social media game, can make the most of it and can acknowledge their shortcomings and git gud.

>>6737248
>>6737254
>>6737344
>>6737346
>>6737356
No, you faggots, she is a real 100% woman, we even saw her nudes at some old /trash/ thread when we found out (she was kinda cute desu).
That happened literally not so long ago, you cannot be this new.