/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7038762
Your bad faith argument got argued but you said the equivalent of
>NO. I'm right ur wrong because i just am ok?
While also committing all the logical fallacies

Learn to bait and to argue, retard.
Do you want to take it one step further though? post your work, which will clearly be ai generated and then you will suuuurely epic troll us

>>6704719
>artists and consumers are outright obsessed with having realistic artworks with highly realistic details
>artists gets praised by consumers
>consumers get to consume
>the more realistic a piece of art is done the """better""" it is considered
>"omg it looks just like a photograph" is all people want to consume
>some techfags make an app that automatically does that
>artists lose their collective shit because they can't wow normies anymore
>they still keep churning out bland, soulless shit because that's what gets them ez praise from normies

>>6629489
>Your skills has been invalidated and you probably never made anything worth while. >Prompters can easily make what they want >and it will look better than what you can do. >That's why you're acting so autismal, you can't cope.
Spoken like true cattle who only consumes and never questions.

If art is only worth anything by the metric of by technically accurate to real life it is; you don't understand art.

Prompters always use this meme of;
>"b-b-b-but it can do better than you! gotcha!"
Photoshop has existed for decades, any artist with a few years on their belt can do realistic pictures, any artist who went to art school learns by drawing realism first.

I seriously wonder what you're getting out of being retarded only to spam cope&seethe and the usual preschool banter i.e. "no u" whenever you have no comeback.

The only real chance of prompters ever being considered a real artist is if they take their own lives, because at least that action will have real context and a narrative, than just some randomly generated photoshop girl with her tits out staring at the viewer.

AI art is the same as porn, it has no artistic merit or value except for people to jerk off about how good it looks.
It is worthless trash, kitsch and not really worth pursuing.
The one's coping are AIshitter; imagine being so fucking pathetic that you desperately want to be seen as an artist by not even doing anything but just typing words into an automated photoshop and arguing with artist online, trying to ragebait them only to post cope&seethe as a response.

The skill of an artist isn't just how well they can make a picture that looks as well-rendered and consumable as possible.
Please, stop trying to communicate and keep consuming the pretty pictures like the worthless cattle you are.

>>6486602
of course people are going to try again and again retard
doesn't mean they can't drop in to vent about art being hard (which it is) in a thread with other so-called ngmis now that proper /vent/ threads are no longer being made

you should make like this >>6486526
clueless faggot and fuck off to positivity hugbox land