/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6974826
kek, you really do hate it that much. Good call, I shall stop using that word just so you still see it.
>>6974862
>I was told that a character design doesn't necessarily need to be "attractive", but they need to be "interesting and charismatic".
I mean, considering not every character is "attractive", in the sense of beauty, it makes sense. Hell, not even charismatic, but just interesting or engaging.
>>6974865
Neat! I like this, honestly. Also, is it me or you're making her tits bigger on every iteration? kek

>>6813616
>Me conocian como "Adam", principe de Gayskull.
>Hasta que un buen dia, me meti la espada en el ORTO!! (Ayyy!)
>Ahora me llaman...
>I-VAN
>Y ONIONS UN TROLAZOOOOO!!!
Never gets old.

>>6807042
>MAAM (male) PLEASE SHUT UP AND LISTEN YOUR NOT LISTENING TO ME LISTEN
kek

>>6526519
>is it too late for me because AI yadayada
No.
AI can only do either generic shit, or a mishmash of generic shit as a pretext to pass as something innovative, no inbetweens. As long as you dont do generic stuff and find a way to stand out in your works, (something the AI is very incapable of) you should be good. Dont become a doomer retard because of some even more rerarded fags, anon, do your kinky stuff and get some good bucks out of it, there's a market for you out there and you'll gmi as long as you push through
>Verification not required.

>implying he is not the one with poor tastes