[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.7071059 [View]
File: 277 KB, 1512x2016, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7071059

>>7071049
>>7071049
Arrested? Damn. your story makes me respect you all the more. damn. I also just feel the whole being spooked thing too.

this is the only stencil i still have up
hope you have a good day anon you sound like you deserve one

>> No.6750503 [View]
File: 277 KB, 1512x2016, generator stencil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6750503

>> No.6687417 [View]
File: 277 KB, 1512x2016, generator stencil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6687417

here's one i did on a generator recently

>> No.6670410 [View]
File: 277 KB, 1512x2016, generator stencil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6670410

>whatcha guys think of my street art

>>6661570
>>6662875

I learned during my brief stint as a Philosophy major, the 5 elements to good argumentation:

1) Establish your authority (credentials/experience you have to back up why I should care about your opinion)

2) Define and clarify any ambiguous terminology that could be misconstrued so that both parties arguing are on the same page:
"What do you mean frogs can fly? Of course they can't!"
"Frogs can totally fly, they have feathers!"
"Do you mean Birds? Frogs are green amphibians."
"Ohhhhh. My mistake."

3) Adjust argument to align with any new information, not that you are just giving up, but this part shows you are not a diehard zealot and have actually thought about the intricacies of your argument.
"What do you mean demolish capitalism? You can't do that!"
"I'm for a complete reformation of this otherwise diseased and incompetent system."

4) Whats the catch? Every working system has an X, a downside, an outlier, and ulterior motive, a redpill, a taboo side nobody dare speak of etc. If the person you are arguing with cannot find any flaws within their system of thought, they're probably at best adopting the philosophy just to be edgy and haven't realistically thought it through.

Take for instance the very definition of anarchy:
1.
a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority or other controlling systems.
2.
the organization of society on the basis of voluntary cooperation, without political institutions or hierarchical government; anarchism.

Statement 1 and 2 are in complete opposition to one another logically. This is why the joke "Its very hard to organize an anti-organization organization"

5) Lastly, expect the worst in terms of demeaning comments or personal attacks, but try not to take it personally. Some people really are passionate enough to do the proper research but get defensive when they have to explain it. I've learned a lot from actually losing arguments.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]