/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6386606
I don't agree. It's too low quality and fever dreamy to replace concept artists. The people who will use it for that, maybe small companies, aren't going to be hiring people for those roles, anyway. And the slot machine problem will exist as long as they use word prompts, because it's the translating the idea or mental image into text in the first place what has the most information loss - never mind all of the extra fucking around with models, hypernets, etc, that each introduce their own extra noise from the same process of trying to describe images using words. And this is on top of the settings departing from your imagination. i don't have a cfg slider in my head or on my stylus. I don't need to find the right everything when I want to draw something, I just do it, and then I refine it until it's bleeding close to what I was thinking of. And that factor while small for me, is going to be massive for AI after all of those things.

So as a simple creative aid, maybe, but I don't see anyone losing their jobs to it.
>[100k word prompt]
>Ah, so that's what the Queen being shagged by Hitler looks like! It's a shame it isn't 30% what I imagined and most of the details are wrong, but after rerolling this a dozen times, he is indeed properly shagging her, and so I am happy with the result. Hm, maybe I will make a film about this. "The Hitler who Shagged Queen Elizabeth".
I don't know, though, we'll see. I'd love for a world where nobody had to draw. Imagine waking up in the morning, and being able to continue your dreams without any time limits. I would be overjoyed if ai imaging and everything else got to that point.