/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3847102
Pretty much what I wanted to ask.
Also pirate-friendly?

>>3847068
Ha ha, lol
#2 is the one that pisses me off because you can tell he actually believes it

>>3782466
Oh thank god, I can finally talk about this.

>who the hell is going to give away info they've learnt the hard way, that
>the previous generation never wanted to share either?
Anyone that wants to be known far and wide as the best and smartest and richest art teacher. Anyone who takes moral offense at the idea that practical knowledge could ever be forgotten. Everyone who has ever made the amateurish mistake of streaming.

Think about this- all that bitterness that I can feel bleeding through your post? All that hatred that you feel for the conspiracy? That's not unique. Everyone hates cheaters. If the former conspirators can't get revenge on you it is a moral imperative and a pleasure to end them. Somehow this hasn't happened. In a population that's massive, thinly spread, and made up of emotionally immature divas... No one's spilled the beans. Not for their own aggrandizement or to ruin a rival.

Inevitably, there exists a bad teacher who has streamed his work. The methods he's using are clearly different from the ones he teaches. Is it more likely that a) he forgot he was full of shit, or b) he's just a bad teacher?

I'm not even gonna begin on post #4-he gets everything so opposite I'm choosing to believe he's being sarcastic

>>3706895