/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6873938
that's not how things work imo.
even gesture proves that. if you could actually imagine it in any level of detail, you wouldn't need to make quick gestures to jot it down.
same with working from big to small.
it's more like you're half working with the plan in your head and half working with what is already on the page, which then updates your plan in the mind.

>When you were "redlining". Did you actually reimagine in your head how the pic should look like or did you just look at lines that aren't in correct proportion?
more the latter

>>6857745
>Why do you keep coming back, anon? Why are you so hellbent on pushing this AI agenda on this board?
i've said it over and over again and you refuse to read or learn. you only believe what what you make up inside your own head.
it's because just about everything you say about AI is wrong and delusional.

actually, this is a perfect example of it >>6857726
just about everthing in this anons understanding of AI is completely wrong.

>It's artwork. I want critique.
l m a o.....
i don't even care about critique with my real art, not from here. especially now.
fun fact, i used to make redlines for others around here. a long long time ago.

>>6857737
>>6857729
>>6857728
then show me how it's not overfitting.
again, you work off cope and pure delusion.

explain why it doesn't happen every time.
or very simply. just explain to me how it is stealing in the first place when it makes completely different images.
or explain to me WHAT it is stealing, considering it makes completely different images.

>>6857818
okay. then explain how it is not learning.
explain what it is doing instead.