/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6852675
sure, you can argue that the AIs outputs don't belong to anyone.
what if i have input? what if i drew the pose, then roughly sketched a sofa, roughly painted some dog and cat? what then?

>>6852683
i do not think it belongs to the source of the training data....
that's like saying what i make belongs to the people i've been inspired and learned from.

>>6852680
>I'll be honest with you, I don't give a shit what you're calling the process.
that's beacuse you know this matters. you dishonest fuckwit.
it's the only thing that matters in this argument.

>YOU, the retard I'm speaking with, are using a computer software to take someone's art and mimic it.
am i mimicking someone's art by using SD? that's the question. you refuse to answer my above question, yet here you are claiming that SD is taking other people's art. so you're just gonna dodge the argument?

>the minute detail of the process behind doing this, is completely irrelevant.
oh i guess it's irrelevant and i'll just call it theft and stealing then.
t. you

just handwave everything away and start trolling, like that other anon :)
I'm waiting for it. i've seen it enough.