/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

REACHING

>>3604053
>>3604042
I'm not interested in your essays when you open them with the same boring bullshit about your feelings about me or how mad you are that there are multiple threads that haven't died. I wanted to let the Elon one and this die but someone else bumped them to be around for another day so I responded. If you wanted to give critique maybe don't bury in a wall of text about all the fucking threads there are. Make the board faster if that bothers you so much you sniveling asshole.

>Jesus christ, stop for a second and think what you're doing.
Yeah I made thread on Wednesday and it's still around on Saturday. THE HORROR!
>this is tracing and painting over shabbily.
It's a grid. And it's ok.
>Do yourself a favour and ask yourself what you even want to achieve
Making you fucking agitated is good enough probably.
>pend some time with some anatomy courses from cgpeers and get to know stuff in 3d space
eh.
>I am no master myself
was self evident.
>but what you are doing is grotesque
good.
>At least try to improve instead of churning out the same garbage please,
I have.
>you are shitting /ic/ up with your weird paintings
cry more. Post your own shit. Nobody is stopping anyone else from doing this too. It's not really my problem that the board is full of impotent virginal do-nothing faggots that choose to do nothing and whine at those that do something.
>you come across as a self-proclaimd pathos-ridden genius, trying to 'beat' Van Gogh.
It's mostly just because it's a good external motivator with the added benefit of triggering assholes like you.
>You are embarassing yourself
Said the anonymous asshole. You should be embarrassed every day you're not producing. Look at all this fucking self-justification you're projecting at me. I hope you suffer a traumatic brain injury and lose your sense of smell.
>Get the fuck out of here you goddamn piece of shit.
CRY MORE LMAO

>>3534948

>>3510404
>No it hasn't.
jesus christ what a belligerent asshole. are you fucking retarded?
>You sound like someone who neither understand photography or the movie industry nor the effects that can be achieved through hand crafted imagery and why it is still applied with success in today's world.
you sound like someone that is desperate to stress how much you like to think you "understand photography or the movie industry nor the effects that can be achieved through hand crafted imagery and why it is still applied with success in today's world" without being able to demonstrate that you actually do. what an useless, faggy thing to mumble at someone.

Not to mention we're talking about basic art history and industrialization and shit. What was valued in art, particularly portraiture, changed dramatically with the arrival of machines that could do that cheaper, easier, and more accurately than any craftsman.

Saying that the fields of painting, filmmaking, and print photography have similar applications doesn't negate the fact that like 150 years ago 1 of those 3 industries didn't exist and the other was in it's infancy. All of modern and contemporary art history is reflected by a shift in demand away from valuing an art's ability to realistically capture life (because cameras do that now) to art's ability to convey feelings and ideas etc.

>An average caricature artists could say more about your subjects in 5 min or less with a simple pen and that drawing would have more value because of that.
Yeah I spent a semester in like middle school learning caricature. Literally anyone can do it. It's like a rubix cube or magic or whatever, it's very formulaic. But yeah you're right. When your subjects have giant heads, are sitting on their favorite car/animal/boat while wearing a shirt with their favorite team and waving a flag and holding their favorite drink you can really convey a lot about them huh.

who is this?