/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4502612
Not nicnac, but I think they posted this before as a breakdown

>>4473228
Haven't found the panel yet, will be asking some fellow daddos over the next several days whether they would be interested in taking part with the grading process.

I do, however, have some other news for the April Tier Tourney. Attached is a picture of what the current v0.1 Rubric looks like currently. I'll explain my reasoning for each category, but first we gotta talk how this will be used.

For each weekend, each participant creates their piece that they will be submitting for that weekends prompt. Each piece will be reviewed by (ideally) a panel of myself and 3 other lassos/daddos.

Each member of the panel will score the piece under the four categories from 0 - 5 and then compute the combined category score.

After all panel members have graded, each piece's combined category score from all 4 panelists will be averaged out for the overall score.

After all three weekends we can take the 3 overall scores and find the mean or median for each artist's tier ranking.

From here, we can go a couple of directions.
By taking median rather than mean we can snip off score outliers while also giving daddos breathing room in case they cannot do all 3 pieces but still want their close to accurate tier rank.

(E.g. I submit two pieces, both getting 15s. My 3rd piece is a 0 for no submission. Under a mean ranking, I would be a 10. Under a median I would be 15, a significant difference. Yenno?)

Or we could just take the mean of only those who submit all 3 pieces and call it a day. What's your guys thoughts?

1/2