[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.6725139 [View]
File: 390 KB, 949x863, 1683743249486164.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6725139

never, ever follow the advice of some ic shitter. I did the opposite of what some anon said in one of those '' artist redpill'' threads and it gave me more gains in a week that i have ever gotten in a year

>> No.6670666 [View]
File: 390 KB, 949x863, 1682009181901583.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6670666

>>6670576
You are pulling shit out of your ass mate. There is no empirical evidence that visualizing a cat interpolates between all the cats I ever saw. If you had any then you could go ahead and grab your nobel prize. r/singularity might have brainwashed you into believing that humans and AI are so similar that surely we can pull comparisons like this out of thin air when there's no evidence whatsoever to back it up in the neuroscience department.

On the other hand what we demonstrably understand is that when you think about a cat you also think about how much it weights, how it moves, how its fur interacts with light etc..
AI only thinks (it doesn't) about values derived from 2d on a virtual graph.
When I see a cat in a jpg I don't compute the jpg itself through algorithmic bullshit, what I do is study that cat within that picture and learn to deconstruct it into shapes, colors etc. that might not even be present within that picture. Then, I can pair that knowledge with the aforementioned experiences to be able to reconstruct it by myself in different ways.

If you're not an Altman shill but genuinely believe what you're peddling, you should try running an imagegen AI on a dataset comprised of two pictures only. You will then be able to observe how it can only interpolate smears between these two pictures and understand how it "learns" from objective data in a way fundamentally different from ours, and that "learning" in the human sense of the word doesn't even apply there. It is closer to an autocorrect tool or a photocopier than a human bean. Don't be a tool.

>> No.6648329 [View]
File: 390 KB, 949x863, 1682009181901583.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6648329

>>6647891
It is delightful to witness more and more platforms tell AI faggots to fuck off like the undesirable subhumans they are
If you don't ban it outright, your service will just crumble under unbearable machine vomit spam, simple as

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]