/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6244013
I wonder how it feels being one of these artists, knowing billions will now know your name and use it to generate AI pics in your quality/style from now on, but none will ever bother to give a single like to the original art you made yourself. Their lives and careers are all being turned into spray paints in real time, Something like being forcefully subjected to communism without receiving any of its benefits

>>6242713
>You create a marketplace that doesn't allow replicas,
Uuh that didn't work well for art, we have a lot of NFTs clearly made after artists's styles like picrel.
Taking Dark Souls for example for this game marketplace in your ideal future, would another game Nioh be allowed in it even though it could be simply prompted as "dark souls in Edo Period with Yokai"? And you're aiming to use AI art to make your game, yet don't think it would be hypocritical to have your game allowed in?

>>6220435
Wrong. I would be neutral to AI if it wasn't for the fact that it aims to facilitates to a degree where it requires no effort to rip off literally anyone. The most used prompts for quality right now are tending on pixiv or artstation. This piece of shit just drinks people's blood with random watermarks popping up ever so often

>>6213279
Lol only now I saw this. These techfucks are really the embodiment of chutzpah, putting artist's names in their website as suggestions for consoomers to rip art from. I can't possibly envision something more disgusting than this, putting human creativity in a bottle.