/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3725025
>I saw the last guys reply and saw myself mentioned, brainlet
dope. I saw someone randomly say "also, rockwell." And from what I remember I've only had one /beg/ kid post some traced Rockwell memes, so I went ahead and jumped to making an ass out of you and me.
>You're so triggered it hurts.
Triggered by what tho? did you have a point?
Seems like I'm not the one samefagging and seeking out reasons to talk shit to strangers. That's (you) my goob.
>he thinks I trace
I don't think about you at all.
>Thanks for the compliment, Jimmy.
What was the compliment? That I made fun of you for feeling special for copying some Rockwell memes in some workbook?
>The fact that you think such good drawing could only be traced
I mean if you want to tell yourself this goof for you I reckon. I think it's a boring copy of something that beginners do.
>simultaneously illuminates your lack of skill AND my adeptness.
I like how you spend so much time talking about how adept you think you are. I wouldn't know, anon. You're talking to yourself.
>How does it make you feel knowing I only started painting with color a month ago and have already far surpassed your best efforts?
I mean, I don't necessarily feel anything about any of the interactions I have with edgy losers. And are you suggesting that your pic related is a painting?
>AND I don't use a grid to draw my portraits, either.
But you use a computer? I use a ruler and paint and stuff. Put it on a canvas. It's a whole process. And you're saying that with the aid of thousands of dollars of computer technology and software you've managed to "surpass my best efforts?" I mean I'd hope so. You choose colors by clicking on them. You hit a button and mistakes stop existing. Same thing as what I'm doing clearly!
> lmaoing at your life, loser.
A: I doubt you're really laughing at all. You were likely sitting by yourself and maybe breathing extra heavy when you wrote this.

>>3703107
>Why is it so hard for you consider your art is bad.
I don't really care if it is. I value production itself. Wrote a haiku about it:
>Nothing is perfect;
>and anything is better.
>Time is entropy.

> It's not even original.
I'd venture to argue that very few people would be able to replicate my aesthetic.
>You're just painting memes.
Yeah. There are very few meme painters. There were even less 2 years ago. And there will be hundreds more in the coming years. It's funny to me to see you jump from "It's not even original" to "You're just doing something that nobody else thought to do."
>Badly.
Does it upset you that the standards that you use to justify why you do nothing dont effect me? Like these threads are ideally about (you) helping a belligerent dipshit make art better. This idea that you need to obsess about how "bad" I am and basically just refuse to do anything ITT other than whine about it is kind of weird to me. It always just screams that you're super insecure about your own shit and you're kind of blatantly projecting the cognitive dissonance you feel about yourself at me.

Like how often do you choose NOT to do something for fear of it ending up being "bad?"

>>3684830
straight people don't really stumble into drawing boy love cartoons anon

well that sucks.

>>3676626
>"An avatar is a repetitive image or set of images that a user persistently attaches to their posts in an effort to uniquely identify themselves.
not really my fault that people recognize my work m80.
>...This immediately lowers the level of discourse, and derails the thread to be about the avatar user instead of about the topic of discussion.
This is a memeschlock thread. The only anon derailing the topic of discussion is (you).
>This form of attention-whoring is not welcome on 4chan.
This is a thread about my work and the concepts of memeschlock and shit. If you take issue with this you take issue with every artist that's willing to put themselves out there and interact with other people on /ic/.

Like what exactly are you concerned about here? What are you gatekeeping really?

>/ic/ is not your personal blog. 90% of your last thread was just you talking to yourself.
I was just posting what I was working on and talking and interacting about it. What's the actual problem uuuu?

Sorry if I was mean to you at some point but "having recognizable work" and "posting reaction images" and "posting your work in the art board" aren't against the rules. Why would you want them to be?