/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2429898
>actually quite distressed about the amount of bs literature practitioners in the field feel they need to produce in order to present their work properly

There is experiencing a work and then understanding it, then understanding enough to put that knowledge into practice. We need that literature to explain for the future creators to understand just what the fuck is going on. It's not required to show and experience the work, it's needed to comprehend it. Like comments in code, it doesn't effect the execution but it does effect the developers that inherit the codebase. I mean I still don't understand painting with a vagina, but there is probably literature backing it up. Now separating bs documentation from valuable documentation is hard.

>muh old masters.
Based.

>And if you gave a shit about where I'm coming from, you're welcome to check out the manifesto I linked to.
Entire reason I'm here man. Gives more holistic view to the process.

>believe sincerity, transparency and acceptance of circumstance are important values in what ever follows.
Can you expand on this? Also I'm going to throw something at you, God never died, he's just been relegated to the space between your ears. Who's to say that this 'objective' reality that we've conceptualized from subjective experience is actually how that shit works out there?

>but to merely sigh and roll...
Can't photograph space marines.

> I figure the sculptures in this series as altars or idols of a fictional culture, risen from an irrational need for a system of belief in a world strangely void of meaning and built out of trash.
iPhone on a monolith, cellular jammer in the base. Critique that on instahoe you fucks. Approach the holy object with reverence to the peace and disconnection it brings. But I love the draws to contemporary society through fiction/gallery. Noice.
t.