/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

How many of you actually used the sticky to learn from? I liked it when people used to post that stupid upside down drawing exercise not having a fucking clue as to what was the whole point of it.

Why can't you just accept the Ai for what it is - a tool being used on a digital medium?
>It steals my work and my style
You learned how to draw in a particular style from someone else, and the work you feel is yours is always referenced from a source just like the Ai.
>It devalues art! It attacks the human spirit!
Your banana taped on a wall will retain its value due to money laundering. As for the human spirit and expression it is not confined to visual arts if you feel the need to express yourself you can simply write a blog about the sand inside your vagina.
>YWNBAA
A toddler drawing happy faces is considered an Artist as art is entirely subjective, and the Ai encourages creativity by supplementing different interpretations of ideas to work with.
>Ai will saturate the industry with soulless pin up art
All the more power for you to stand out from the regurgitated 3/4 bust shot crop of the flavor of the month, you do draw full illustrations other than 3/4 floating animu heads in the void right?
>Muh copyrights!
Do you work for Nintendo? Even so, could you provide sufficient proof of infringement for a litigation against the hundred of thousands of Artists who illustrate Pokeman fanart? I think not.