/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6805589
This is actually breddy gud.

>>6671383
Then how will I learn multicolor pen shading? That was the question.
>would probably be better
Which means possibly would not be better.
>IRL will blow smoke
I know who's lying and I can tell the difference. I've even done shit ones to see if I get false praise.

Also the time to critique was >>6669250 here.
This is where and more importantly when I asked. I didn't ask for shit after it was inked, nor an assessment of how I should allocate my practice. I never acknowledged that this was the standard thinking.
My problem with him is the rudeness. My problem with (you) is like him, you aren't addressing the question. How do I get better at this technique of I don't put hours into it. This is a terminal goal not a incidental goal. It's intrinsically subjective and there's no arguing that it's what I want to do. The argument that massing figures will make me better at figures much less multicolor shading isn't a certainty. I've personally tried it and found that taking my time on a single piece had yielded dramatically better results for me, and seeing as I've already acknowledged that mass figures is the group think and that I'm the only one with access to excitemental data on what works for me, I'm going to say that on the subject of what is working more effectively for me, I'm the better informed individual here.
Cranking out progressively less shitty figures may have worked for (you). It may have worked for the majority of your class, but I can assure you it is a horribly inefficient waste of my time and effort.
You know what else is a waste of time and effort? Arguing with me after I already acknowledged the commonly held way of doing it and that out explained that I wasn't.