/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2143987
>even a 2 y/o can draw kanji without knowing what it means.
are you STILL not getting it?
this is completely beside the point you retard. you are talking as if we are debating writing skill or something. like "which side is better". that's not the point.
again, stop being so insecure when these comparisons happen.

>not really since the overall processes involved in drawing them aren't any more difficult than english letters
but it is. stop being delusional.

>but a straight straight line in the kanji day is no harder than a straight line in the letter A, there's just more lines in the kanji than in A.
but in the west you don't have to make a straight line, then draw a box in the middle, add dots in every conceivable direction, add more lines, curves, boxes and dots just to complete one sign.

the japs learn these signs and learn know them well enough that they can draw most of them in maybe arounf 5 seconds. do you understand how much of a difference this is compared to the alphabet?
it IS a huge difference. look at pic related. all these signs, they "draw" day in day out. and they do it starting from their childhood. all this should make a difference.

even if you say that the difference is small, imagine writing a school essay with this. this is their fucking language. doing this day in day out, it would be weird if it didn't affect their motor skills.

>>2144006
>there are only a handful of strokes and they are tiny.
just kill yourself. again, if that's the case then the alphabet is even more simple. and that's the point.
> There being more strokes in a kanji than in a letter is utterly irrelevant
it is not irrelevant because you get used to making lots and lots of marks in a small space.
>Provide a study correlating kanji with artistic skill or fuck off.
look for it yourself. this is just a hypothesis.