/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>1669775

Yeah, pretty much just that. It keeps you from getting attached so you can just focus on rapid ideation, and also forces you to be a bit more deliberate with your composing ability. It's a good call to start something new, not being excited about a piece will kill it harder than about anything else.

>>1669496

Hey, thank you :]

I don't agree entirely with every change you've made, but I'm also a bit wary to be opposed to it out of defending myself, or out of the fact that your changes will not be as polished as what I had. Render can really influence those decisions in detrimental ways. I agree with how the flag doesn't pop out and about the helmet... tassle hair, though I'd solve them differently. Also the hill does feel like it cuts off a bit, doesn't it? It's more of a drawing issue, though.

>>1669500
>>1669638
>>1669641

I actually disagree, I enjoy being critiqued by about anyone. The thing you have to remember is the direction that you had intended the piece to go in, the special thing you wanted to say with it, and if the person critiquing has taken that into account versus just pushing it in the direction they would have done it in. In this case I feel it's a bit of the latter, but there's still useful bits in there.

Also a photo-ref study from something that I found on tumblr. Fun stuff, I might try doing a portrait one sometime soon, but there's a finished piece I want to start beforehand. I might post it in stages on here.