/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3382074
is probably how uncartoonish the render is while the line-art doesn't look realistic.

Look at that face

My recommendation is to give it a thicc line-art in the edges and to smooth it more

>>3318002

>>3007128
git gud, so u can maek it lool gud

>>2822564
3/3

Learn anatomy

>>2771425
ohh, I get it now.
OP is talking about artist pulling out of their ass the "semi-realistic", aka "my style" aka "i don't know how to draw and I'm just excusing myself".

If yes, then yes. It's a bullshit excuse.

If you are actually interested on pushing the realism and stylization, then
>>/ic/thread/S2636135

>>2713741
You fool!.
Those with un-trained eye do have lower standards, but their mind is also more appreciative for good well crafted work. Just go to that /thrash/ thread, and see it by your own eyes.
> In aesthetics the uncanny valley is the hypothesis that human replicas that appear almost but not exactly like real human beings elicits feelings of eeriness and revulsion among some observers.
tl;dr: The most elements that resemble the human figure, the most are we likely to react to it.
Yeah I know this is kyle shut up I'm just trying to get my point across

>>2636305
k. You don't seem to understand so I'll explain to you.
> In aesthetics the uncanny valley is the hypothesis that human replicas that appear almost but not exactly like real human beings elicits feelings of eeriness and revulsion among some observers.
tl;dr: The most elements that resemble the human figure, the most are we likely to react to it. Not that cartoons and alike don't have its place, bur the artists like pic related handle those elements in the intended way (to arouse the audience) and while you could argue that some people wont nut to it, the mastering of those techniques and elements would allow you to toy around with it even more, thus, being able to recreate closer whatever you wanted to convey.

here's a good artist, lots of skill, knowledge of anatomy, great form and stylized very nice.