[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.2548134 [View]
File: 40 KB, 174x243, 1462062815986.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2548134

If I create a site where everyone can sperg and rank LASers - how would you want it to function?
Some thoughts:

1. There's 10 levels, you drag users to the rank you think they belong in, and they are placed in the average of everybody's votes. (5 people place person A in levels 1,2,3,3 and 3, average level = 2.4 = put into level 2). You would see your own ranking tree and the total opinion next to it. This is the way I like the most.

2. Option 1 with fewer levels.

3. Option 1/2 with the most voted level as their total opinion instead of average. (5 people vote person A into level 1, 10 people vote him into level 5 = his total level will be 5 as it has the most votes).

4. Everyone votes on the entrants once, can either vote them up or down, the person with most votes is ranked highest. (No tiers/levels system).

5. Option 4 with groupings, levels 1-10, based on thresholds for amount of votes they've gotten. (Person A is in level 1, has 4 votes, someone upvotes him to 5, he gets pushed to level 2 which is in this example 5-10 points).

6. Option 4/5 (either works) where everyone has multiple votes for every entrant, so you can vote someone up 5 times or just 1 if you don't think they deserve more than that.

Other ways to do this?

Additionally: Should only active LASers be part of the ranking or the fallen be included as well - I'm thinking all should be included atm. Maybe ignore people with few submissions, say 10 or less.

Made a poll, but I'd prefer some comment feedback as well. http://www.strawpoll.me/10392658

>> No.2506450 [View]
File: 40 KB, 174x243, 1444677671306.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2506450

>>2506106
Looks good, thanks man. Those waterbrushes look pretty fun too, might grab one.

>>2505488
Thanks anon, see you at the top.

>>2505344
Yeah well, milt kahl is dildos. For real though I don't animate or plan to any time soon, but the link looks handy for the future, I'll keep it around. Cheers for the rest, I could probably do with being a bit smarter about studying.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]