/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6510266
This isn't the discord this is ic, so fuck off back your failed art board and stop bringing your vendettashit to this thread. Noone cares about your simp crusade to win the heart of your prized pig, or whatever other schizo occupation you actual niggers cooked to keep your dead drama going. Those anons are making efforts to draw, and scribbletard is just fucking around. Go be gay somewhere else.

>>6418736
>>6418744
>>6418749
Bitch who fucking cares just own it. You will never find another group of chill like-minded majority femanons that draw well are supportive of eachother endeavors and take a fucking joke without all of the clout chase faggot hierarchy shit, weird moid simping, smooth brain drama faggotry, or gay ass attention whoring 'woe is me' fishing bullshit that plagues almost all art circles. And if you see a take that is too spicy then don't chime in simple as. Like seriously, imagine not being cringe in good company because you're fucking scared some seething troon or grassless incel will judge you. Couldn't be me.

>>6391541
The sheer irony of you, of all people, saying that the face in OP is "wack" when you consistently create stuff like this >>6391561 with your flat beachball heads and anthro-animal-like snouts is nothing short of hilarious.

>>6391624
Oh, shut up and get off your high horse, mikutranny. I've been here since about 2018 or so and all I've ever known you to be is a permanently seething contrarian and one of the worst crabs on this board. Case in point, you trying to discourage other artists and make them feel useless in this very thread.
>"productive"
>"""artists"""
There are not enough quotation marks in the known universe to adequately express the depth of sarcasm I have imbued into those words. They aren't artists. They're a gaggle of room temp IQ coomers doing the same thing they always have. Namely, typing words into boxes to find fapping material. All they're doing is posting booba and boota and whatever assorted pornographic crap they dredged up out of the congealed sludge made of whatever artwork they hoovered up off the internet and shoveled into the Stable Diffusion algorithm.
No shit they don't have any points of contention in their little cumbrain hugbox. They have no stake in this, no pride, no passion. They are not creators, they did not "produce" anything, they are consumers. No more and no less.

>>6383331
I've heard anons who attributed the same kind of " it's so deep and interesting bro, just look at the painting bro it's like so deep and spiritual broh. broh..." thing to Jackson Pollock paintings too. Honestly, I think they just drank the Kool-Aid and memed themselves into believing the Emperor's clothes are real. They go on and on about how the context of the piece is important, you have to view it in le CONTEXT of LE ART HISTORIE... but isn't that like a piece of media that relies on references to current trends and events to derive any value? Some flash in the pan crap? A LITERAL meme?
If you didn't know who Jackson Pollock was, his art would look suspiciously like a painter's dropcloth that someone hung on a wall and it wouldn't move you whatsoever. Same goes for Rothko's paintings, without context it could very well just be some piece of background decoration to take up wall space in someone's office and no one would give it any more than an idle perusal. Marcel Duchamp's Fountain would just be a urinal that someone left lying around and nothing more.

Marcel Duchamp himself pooh-poohed his contemporaries for making "retinal" art that's only about the visual, and touted his art as something that "served the thinking", but isn't the point of visual art to communicate visually? Did it ever occur to him or anyone else that if your artwork needs to be accompanied by a 50 page manual telling why and how it's artistically significant and interesting and good, maybe, just maybe, your art isn't any of those things? Does conceptual art really "serve the thinking" when you essentially have to be TOLD what to think about the art piece? I understand that context enriches the appreciation of a piece, but if all you have is all tell and no show, it stops being visual art and becomes a piece of creative writing instead.