/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4851505
>They didn't draw porn though
They regularly pushed it as far as they could given their times, so in some eras no, it just wasn't allowed, if they could have many would have I'm certain.
So what exactly is your point, that sexuality shouldn't be expressed in art? How is expressing your sexuality not a valid form of artistic expression? It's part of the human experience. How is that not prudish?
But I've talked to your type plenty of times, your type almost always only shames male sexuality and leaves women's stuff untouched because the goal is not to be anti sexuality but anti male and you act as if you draw porn you can't draw anything else, as if it's one or the other.
Plenty of artists keep those things separate from each other with a pseudonym.
So once again, get fucked you man hating bitch.