/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6895317
>I put copyrighted content in a zip file
there you go. ignorance.
that's like saying that by reading a textbook, you put its contents in a zip file in your head.

>still, human work was used in the training process
yes. it was learned from.
the "core issue" you people don't understand is that you're asking the AI to come up with something out of nothing.

the other issue is that you don't understand how the AI actually uses the data.

a simple explanation that illustrates how AI trains:
>it tries to see patterns and GENERALIZE from the training data.
>so if trying to train the idea of "smiley", it sees a large amount of smileys.
>and regardless of how all the individual smileys look like, the model will eventually grasp that they all have certain things in common: a circle, and marks for two eyes and a smile.
>that then becomes its representation for that token. "smiley".
notice how there is no focus on copying the individual images or even using the images to directly to create the new images.

instead what is being used it the models internal representation. THE RESULT of the training. so when you prompt "smiley", it doesn't use any image for reference (the images are GONE). it uses its internal representation to create from scratch.

now this is only the simplest example using a very simple object to illustrate the process to you retards. in reality it will grasp much much more complicated patterns (interwoven networks of patterns, really), like how reflections work, how shadows work, how light works, colors work, etc etc.

>repurpose common words to describe superficially similar but very distinct phenomena?
yes, but there is a reason people use the words they do.