/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3749675
>There are census records showing that they existed

Exactly, and they can't just disappear, which means there should be some evidence of them, but for some reason there isn't. It's almost like if Israel and America (as well other parts of Europe and the Americas) didn't take in millions of Jews then you would probably have point. But the fact is they did and you don't.
We already know the physical, logistical, and mathematical impossibilities of destroying 6m bodies in the amount of time given. It's unironically an objective fact that it couldn't be done. Which means where are they? More to the point why didn't the Nazis, you know the same people who the term "German efficiency" was coined for, manage to be so inefficient as to use several small ovens instead of just one big industrial size furnace? I don't want to really get onto the many, many, many inefficiencies of one of the most efficient groups, so we'll just mark that down as pure coincidence, along with the other 6m.
It's impossible to prove a negative, it's the reason you can't prove to me you're not a faggot. All you can really offer is your word (which when your history's most notable liar doesn't really count for much), because you can't show proof for something that hasn't occurred, and all I can offer are many pieces of circumstantial evidence. But where the problem comes in as that if the reverse were the case, you were saying you were a faggot and I was saying you weren't, you could easily prove it by fagging off with someone. I would have no way to disprove this because the evidence doesn't lie, it can't lie.
To put it a different way, the burden of proof lies on you. If an event took place that left at least 6m pieces of evidence, you should be able to provide it, but you can't. And because the truth doesn't fear investigation, it should be illegal in as many countries as possible to question it, because censorship is good, correct?
Gas yourself kike. Your tricks of logic are no good.