/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5048188
Why baseless? I'm basing it on my own experiences, observations and information i've collected over the years tinkering with social media.
Twitter algorithm favors organic behavior i.e. posting like a regular user with varying degrees of post frequency and post diversity.
If you're bluecheckmarked, you'll always get priority, that's why most companies and famous people get checkmarked for a fee, and they will not get pushed down by the algorithm if they run botlike behavior.

IG favors consistency since it works more like a library but it isn't a true social media. If you want to be seen on IG you better use the right tags so your work can be seen by the people you want to see. It's more about putting your work in a specific box and hope that people looking through that box will get aware of you.

The whole
>Nobody knows how the algorithms work for certain
Is legal speech to not get sued to hell and back by companies for revealing company secrets like the algorithm, because if people figure it out, they can game the platform and they're forced to change the algorithm.

And algorithms are not black and white, there are many variables and there will always be some error margin if someone tries to point out how it works but advice should always be take with a grain of salt only a fool would take anything anyone ever says as gospel, but that doesn't give you the right to try to debase anything people say just because of whatever reason you have.

Try to post anything about how the twitter algorithm works and see how fast you'll get your account deleted.

>>4799467
>who is truly curious about your art
How is one supposed to be curios about "your" art.
It's either one likes the art or not.
There is only so much you can ask about one's work.
And you either get a
>wow that looks good
or no responses whatsoever.
Do you really think anyone on this godforsaken planet will ask you
>what was your thought process?
>what is the meaning of this?
>what does it comment on?
When most art that is drawn is pure shallow consumer product?
>OH WHAT IS THE GRANDIOSE MEANING YOU HID IN YOUR WORK OF A FUTA LOLI FUCKING AN ANTHROPOMORPHIC ANIMAL ON A STILL LIFE BG
Anon, pls

>>4772670
>art mommy looking for art bf to nurture their gains
yes
>and then step on
wait, physically or metaphorically?
Because no to both

>>4727446
>question the current thing
>point out the flaws or shit delusions of the faggots lurking this shithole
>point out that if they dont want to get banned they shouldnt brake the rules
>NOOO THE RULES ARE DUMB
>NO HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN MY DELUSIONS THEN???
Nigger, are you fucking retarded?

>>4653217
What do you mean?
I was talking about real people.