/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5096312
GMI
Nipples do not go nuclear with the gap between them like that. They could if the breasts were huge and sagging but not here. In this instance also the clothing should perfectly cover them, but instead here they sit on the cleavage instead of the zenith of the breast.
As a design element the hat is really small. Assuming it's a witch hat but it's really tiny, which is a missed opportunity for some nice exaggeration. It also doesn't rest on the head at all but floats above, redline the scalp and you can see this.
The right hand should be holding onto the leg to hold this pose for more than 3 seconds, but it's entirely absent. The upper body is disconnected with the pose in general, remove the lower body and it would work as a bust piece. Some shoulder action by not having them be level would go a long way. Tilt the head towards the leg also for more curvature and stronger center of mass.
Lower leg and head are too small, and left arm elbow lacks structure.
>>5096942
Technically correct, but at this resolution you want to work shape appeal for all it's got. Avoid having too many bumps and indents with the limbs since even one missing pixel deforms the shapes too much.
See pic related, this lower leg is an unappealing shape. It starts medium, suddenly thickens then suddenly thins into an ankle. Perhaps correct in anatomy but doesn't translate well here, the resolution doesn't allow for the pleasant curves normal art can provide us.
Also lower legs blend too much with thighs. This is hard to solve with shapes as I described so try shading to differentiate the parts. Shading the whole lower leg dark is an effective cheat.
Arms are too noodly and small. Shoulders are also missing.
The back hair view doesn't align with that the front view shows but looks good. Bring the front hair up to the same quality. The stacked blob of outline is strange and looks like a shadow where there should be very little.
Vary facial expression across the poses.