/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

are we all just going to forget the based Karla Ortiz ? I love her

>>2783311
>90% of good artists, and all the best artists are men
You got some stats or anything to back that up other than your own warped world view? Also you need to take into account the context surrounding women in art throughout history and in societies where women are still expected to be nothing more than babymakers.

>>2456802
Can you critique this image Anon?

What skill level do you guys believe is needed for getting Magic or Dnd work? Obviously there are some decent artists working for wizards, but there are many questionable ones as well.
Do you believe sending mails to their artdrop with a good portfolio is the way to go, or is chasing an AD's ass more important / would you say connections matter much?
What is /ic's opinion on WoTC paid work?

>>2284343
You're thinking of style only as something cartoony, but photorealism is a style too. You might need to take shortcuts, but other people develop a style that fulfills all their needs because they're able to. A style can be a self imposed restriction like limiting your color palette while still doing full rendering. It's just whatever you feel not only helps you develop a consistent workflow and allows you to express what you need to express, it also is unique to you and that uniqueness comes through to others. Even if you set out to copy someone else's style, yours will still end up being different simply because you're a different person and you won't physically move or think the same way as the one you're copying, so either way your work will always have a signature about it, you don't necessarily need to try hard for that. I just think it's still helpful to find a way that's YOUR way for the sake of the process going fast enough for you to produce all you want.

pic related is karla ortiz, shes pretty good

>>1762281
lol some of my favourite blizzard art is by her, thought it was a man

>tfw you will never have an art qt to fuck in exchange for lessons