/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4790124
Souru

>>4052575
>Humanity needs to be cleansed with a nuclear holocaust
On that we can agree, Anon.

>>4038516
>If someone gave me carte blanche like that I'd try to make something really special.
Yes, this is what i'm talking about.
I would want to do art to express myself and someone allowing me to freely do what i want and even paying me, can only deserve my purest gratitude.

>>4036167
Times can be hard, i know, but don't worry, Anon.
One day, you'll manage to get a (you) from anyone that isn't me.

>>3989241
>This is considered weird and creative
i want to die

>>3970290
>Not really. Why do you think too literally and in black/white?
>Implying
>Except people will also know which one's are genuine as well? What's your point?
So, it's fine as you long as nobody finds out, amirite?
>Then I guess I just gotta move on? It's not a big deal. Are you in fear of missing out? You sure make some weird extreme scenarios.
Well, declining and demonizing a person for asking to be friends is a pretty extreme scenarion, is it not?
Also, for the sake of the argument, nothing is extreme.
>We're getting off topic and im sorry I'm really at loss on what you're trying to make across
Must anything have an endgoal, can't you enjoy a thing for the thing it is? Or do you always expect something to come out of a thing?
>weregettingofftopic.gif
Nice try, Anon. Have you ever questioned your thoughts? Have you ever dared to be wrong? Have you ever accepted your faults?
Have you ever tried to accept humankind?

>>3867786
>this is a bad move and you know it.
If i had my own domain and wanted to lower the risk of getting sanctioned due to my users uploading content they shouldn't then, of course this is a bad move.
Most people don't even think about why every major social media was shilling the whole Anti-article 13 propaganda.
It's because it will heavily slow down their activities since even the world's whole population couldn't create as much original content in one month as all the stuff that gets uploaded on youtube in a day.
>This could lead to a lot worse.
If any state/government would want to ban any type of expression, they'd do it.
Who's gonna stop them?
People who are forced to work 24/7 and can't even bother to catch up to current events? Which make 70% of most civilized countries tot population.
The 10% who consist of minors, unemployed youth and social rejects, who get willfully ignored because they are valued as less than nothing?
Or the 20% retarted faggots who can't think outside their allowed intellectual capacity?

People ain't gonna do shit except adapt and exploit any given sets of rules.
This is going to be the same. And when laws don't work, they get changed.
This whole hysteria around this subject is just another business trick to get people to side with the big names so they can keep making money off whatever greyzone actiivity they are living on.
If the big corps didn't feel threathened by this laws, you would have seen them trying to initiate active cooperation with the EU instead of
>We're the good guys
>They're the bad guys

>>3851036
Talent pretty much translate into:
High affinity with/for a certain thing/activity
>What is the rate of improvement in the things you do?
>What is the rate of work per day you get done?
>What is the quality of said work?
>Is the quality of work you do also consistent, even after long breaks?
If you have a critical eye and aren't delusional about your work, you can pretty much say it for yourself if you have talent or not.
Talent gets used by normies to describe someone who just put a lot of time in any craft because normies are illiterate and only parrot big words to show their appreciation.
That's why, every week we have Anons askin if they have any talent.
Talent isn't the magical thing that let's you create masterpieces after masterpieces-- you still needs to practice and fail quite a few thousand times.
>>3851214
Basically this.is what my post condenses to.