/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4772265
His anatomy teaching is too thorough and unnecessary. You do not need to learn about the muscles in-between the bicep and tricep, an artist only needs to be aware of the key muscle groups that are most prominent. Sycra does a much better job with this.

>>4683900

how good is this for learning anatomy in stylized drawings

>>3497266

>>3438059
I saw the legs were too long, a lot of it was a bit too thin and a little wonky, but I had to give up on the feet for the right hand side because of the pencil / friction pen overlap just stopped drawing after I erased a bunch and I got frustrated and didn't ink it (like the toes on the left side). Thanks though.
>>3438029
Hrmm, I've been using simplified muscles from Scyra because it's similar to the style I want to work towards, would it be better to use my proper anatomical refs and gifs in the meantime then, or just focus more on getting proportion and fluid gestures right? Or, kind of both?

Would you say Sycra's simplified anatomy thing would be enough to learn from or do I still need to study from other anatomy sources?

How is his skeleton? Is it in anyway better than Loomis?