/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4856342
This bollocks about Rothkos being better in the flesh, is crap, been in a room of them and they were still just over rated big blobs.
ALL physical visual media looks better in the flesh than on a computer, one example is Monet's Rouen series, there was a room of these two years ago in London, up close they were 'meh'. But from across the room in a series, when I turned around and saw them, they were incredible. But on a computer screen there is no assembled viewing across a room, as the artist would have intended once.