/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7054123
Ok. In such case there would need to be three things

>A - A.I/LLM models good enough to detect what is a prompt and what is not. There is no such thing right now. Not even for forensics.
>B - A.I/LLM that can "revert" said changes to a satisfactory degree. How can you undo something that you didn't do nor know how to?
>C - A.I/LLM companies willing to slow down and downscale the whole size of their operations. The whole point is to automate, not to hire curators.

There isn't A,B or C as of right now.

>By the way your post sounds like AIdiot cope

>>4916604
>What the fuck do I do if I keep failing for /ic/ memes and wasting shitload of time on things like that while failing to attain any gains?
Unless you enjoy pulling your hair out in frustration, it will be necessary to accept this fundamental premise:

Premise: The vast majority of /int/s and people who make appealing art probably didn't spent 10,000 hours reading academic art texts, grinding Bargue plates, and doing 9,001 daily gesture exercises. Considering the fact that even the average STEM PhD student isn't studying every hour of every day, most people who draw appealing anime tits, or whatever you admire, probably don't take their studies that seriously either in order to get to "appealing level".

CAVEAT: WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT PROFESSIONAL OR MASTER LEVEL ARTISTS

Conclusion: To get to a basic bitch /int/ level, you probably just need raw mileage and to spend enough time drawing things you enjoy and; as long as you don't have a literal learning disability, you will eventually achieve satisfactory progress. So long as your art goals aren't to create literally master-level output.

>>3921017
>Yea anon just kill your best friend and you'll make it.