/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7139689
It is only personal because you made it personal. Most anon here mean not harm, they come in various shapes and sizes. However, I know exactly who you are, and you know exactly who I am. That is why it is personal, we are communicating in a way that you wanted, in a temporal existence where you and I exist, where I can never leave, it transcend all your abandonment issues, it is your way to feel safe. I can promise you that no amount of meaningful relationship or friendship will fix you, your attachments will not heal you or give you the closure you need. Only you can find it within yourself, one day anon, you will be whole again. But not today, you are not ready to meet me, the hatred is of your own making, you are not ready to face what you have done.

>>5222222
tranny ass soi boi art. no hard edges, everything is soft like vaseline, soft pastels to make people feel calm, ugly twitter tier humanoid subject matter boring xi ass composition, always some dumb gynoid smiling bust. nintendo switch having ass mother fucker drew this. dumb ass faggot shit. this art isnt just bad its terrible. wasted those digits with this ugly shit. what the fuck were you think you dumb bitch?

>>5045634
This is Dunning kreuger
If Schmid is trash and only famous because of his teachings post three plein air painters alive today who are significantly better than Schmid.

>how come vilpuu/huston/xyz don't have any complete works
>where are their PAINTINGS
Why does /ic/ only consider paintings and meme over rendered digital paintings as "complete works". Why can't a charcoal figure drawing be a "complete work"?

can ic tell if these paintings are:
1. cool light/warm shadows?
or
2. warm light/cool shadows?