/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6454266
We worry about the same thing as ever, people profiting of our work, claiming it as their own etc.
It's just like seeing my work on iphone cases on aliexpress.

>>6445790
Yup. pic rel is how it is. This is NOT AI! there is no thinking! no reasoning, nothing like that at all. it's a fucking statistical algorithm! an image Markov chain. a python script! Why in the fuck do you think "it learns like a human" is in any way an excuse for this?

>>6421647
vs...He drew as a child and was serious, quiet, and thoughtful. As a young man, he worked as an art dealer, often traveling, but became depressed after he was transferred to London. He turned to religion and spent time as a Protestant missionary in southern Belgium. He drifted in ill health and solitude before taking up painting in 1881, having moved back home with his parents. His younger brother Theo supported him financially; the two kept a long correspondence by letter. His early works, mostly still lifes and depictions of peasant labourers, contain few signs of the vivid colour that distinguished his later work. In 1886, he moved to Paris, where he met members of the avant-garde, including Émile Bernard and Paul Gauguin, who were reacting against the Impressionist sensibility...

do you get it? do you see the difference?
Not that you must, but do you see that artists may go against their training? creating new forms of art? new styles, new movements? How in the flying fuck is AI the same?

Remember friends, AI image generation is unauthorized use of copyrighted material