/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7159043
>>7154838
Anon, nobody cares.
OP is offering critiques to the best of his abilities, whether those critiques are something we could use or not is up to us. In a board where retarded insults and disingenuous arguments are the norm, someone offering genuine insight is perfectly acceptable. Also he is not implying he is better than anyone, idk where you're getting that from.

I dont understand why are you taking this so seriously. I just grab what I can take from OP's input and Im pretty sure everyone else is doing the same.

>>6962489
Dude, take the projector off your ass lmao. You being a fucking loser doesnt mean everyone is a loser.
>muh genetics
Every single time with you faggots, I swear to god. If you're so adamant on labeling yourself as a failure in the name of genetics, why havent you killed yourself yet? You're not going to do anything of value because your genetics are faulty anyway, so you might as well spare yourself the trouble and kill yourself.

>>6910755
>Already mentioned two completely braindead easy, logical and doable solutions
>doesnt want to do either because it's extremely practical
As a borderline /gd/fag that spergs extremely hard over control over my strokes and layers, I say you are, indeed, retarded.
Why in the world do you need that much control over a speech bubble? Cant you just draw the shape and make a screen fill layer?
>But what if I have to draw it again????
You draw the damn thing again. Are your fingers going to fall off if you do it again? Dont be ridiculous, OP.