/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3657488
Is not even a favor if you don't comply on it.

>>3626709
Yes you stupid nigger.

The point of OP is that the gooks draw inherently better.

But just like I pointed out south korean gooks are the ones doing the animation in both in your chinnese carrots and your 90s cartoons. In fact, "american" 80s-90s cartoons have a 90% for sure to be outsourced.

How much do you want to bet the upper pic in op was drawn in south korea.

>>3626084
>>3626405
He was born and raised in from honk kong, which was heavily anglo influenced until the handover to china in 97.

So take it as you will.

>>3625990
He is not

>>3360440
Your foldings and wrinkles are horrendous, they seem to not be affected by gravity, just look at the end of that dress, some marilyn monroe shit going on and the tits are vacuum sealed. learn anchor points you mongoloid.

read this : >>/ic/thread/S3349311#p3351538

or use references

now do you want me to read it for you like it was a bed time story as well?

>>3354398
>How can I improve?
Life drawing is one of the first things you learn, you would have know than if you opened any god damn book

Read the fucking sticky you retard

>>3326759
There is no ears or forehead or anything

is way fucking harder like that

>>3319254
your fuckign retarded art will look like shitty deviantart kiddy OC without fundies good enough to make the character look tangible
https://youtu.be/XczKQAAVbaA?t=196 (3:16)

>>>/i/ and don't fucking come back you stupid nigger

>>3319816
>Don't make a pure hybrid it'll likely have very bad results and will appeal to neither group.

I hate this kind of mentality. You should writte and draw wathever you can do the best of. First make a good thing and If it ends up being a hybrid then let it be it.

Gashi gashi and Hiroyuki Imaishi get away with it, the same with scott pilgrim and gwenpool

>>2747070
>The beggining of the book felt too fucking easy to me
Everyone says that. Then they draw and realize they fucking suck at comprehending how 3D spaces work.

No. Beginners shouldn't skip lessons just because they feel is too easy.

From Lee Hammond:
>SOME HAVE SAID I PLACE WAY TOO MUCH EMPHASIS ON THE SPHERE, but I disagree. I cannot argue strongly enough the importance of it, and what valuable skills are gained from repeatedly practicing the sphere exercises. Art students will always do better if they stick with drawing spheres until they are accomplished at it. This commits the fi ve elements to memory and makes them second nature to you as you draw. Someone who skips over the sphere part of the book will usually go on to produce drawings that lack dimension and look outlined and fl at.

So go back and read the fucking thing.

>>2735553
Go read the fucking book you lazy nigger
We are not going to help you if just half-ass what we are telling you to study

>>2688780
>Advertising (all forms) is not welcome—this includes any type of referral linking, "offers", soliciting, begging, stream threads, etc.
Fuck off malaria, we have a self promotion thread yet you shove your patreon on everyones throat in all threads you are at.

>>2665510
>54:46
Jesus m8.
But seeing that title I will take a wild guess and say that:
>You can't do fan art of copyrighted material
And that's right, you can't, but there is a big ass * in that sentence

The keywords are "transformative" and "purpose".
You can't publish a barbie pic as a fan art, however, you can as long as it "changes (transforms)" to a related purpose (like information, parody, etc). As an example:
>Tom Forsythe appropriated Barbie dolls for his photography project "Food Chain Barbie" (depicting several copies of the doll naked and disheveled and about to be baked in an oven, blended in a food mixer, and the like), Mattel lost its copyright infringement lawsuit against him because his work effectively parodies Barbie and the values she represents (https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F3/353/353.F3d.792.01-57193.01-56695.html))

Just like I said, this falls into the parody category, which have been used to do "porn parodies": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmAmbS8cWS0

You can argue that the pic itself is not under fair use right now, but it can just by adding something like "princess bitch", or something in a humorous matter.

tl;dr: You can have your twilight sparkle picture with a big ass cock