/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

had a cigarette now im in a piss boats kinda mood

>>3571925
>I'm talking about your evident lack of skill
My love for you is like a truck BER SER KER
>if the pictures you're posting are yours.
Yeah I'll post 20 minute doodles are day bruh. Better than you're anonymous shit. I have some training and experience in cartooning, figure drawing, sculpting, technical drawing, etc. Enough to be able to use it functionally.

You kids masturbate about your ability to hand draw a fucking sketch, as if anyone other you gives a shit about your doodles. Nobody cares about drawings.

You're like calligraphers that think you could write an amazing novel because you're good at cursive.

>You're not skilled enough to even have a focused style yet
And yet I have one. Weird how that works. Post literally anything dipshit.

>When you get good enough
You'll never be good enough. You should kill yourself. \

>Your limitations are not your 'style'.
Sure they are. They always are. Why don't you feel stupid? How young are you?

>I'm yet to see you post anything that shows me
I'm not working for you nigger. You're feeding me. You've yet to post anything at all. You choose to be an anonymous text generator because you're too impotent to do anything else.

>it's anything other than a gimmick being used to justify where you are, ability wise.
I mean, most things generally are. Easier to be productive when you eliminate the expectation that you have to make something amazing or innovative constantly. All you rulesy faggots end up just doing NOTHING because you put doing anything up on some impossible pedestal.

Plus the entire premise is that A: ITS FUCKING TRASH ITS IN THE NAME KYS. And B: ART IS ONLY ABOUT "ABILITY" IN THE MOST SUPERFICIAL FAGGOT KID UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPT. The fact that you fail to understand this speaks to where you are in your "art education." Keep at all your "studies" while posting anonymously kiddo. Everyone will continue not giving a shit about your tryhard donothing opinion.

>>3571494
not enough yellow in the pisswasser

>>3528866
A: "same same but different" is an expression in southeast asian ladyboy prostitute culture.
B: Everything is secretly about figuring how to justify your preversion, and art history has always been a reflection of that. We justify why we used to draw tiddies on church walls as being Fine Art or whatever but in reality it's just humans obsessing about what they're hardwired towards worshipping.

So when I say same same but different, I'm saying that, like a blowjob from a thai ladyboy, an amazing rendered statue of venus may technically be "different" than a japanese time stop gang bang video while being an extension of the "same same" human prevert in stinks.

>>3311271
ok. Having a hard time reading your gooksprecht. Use greentext or something dipshit.

Let's look at this "corner" then. Can you please walk me through how you think a fucking cloudscape would need graphite transfer? And I asked for THE MOST applicable paintings I can use as a portrait painter, and you posted an fucking oil cloudscape? That's the easiest scape there is. And YOU HAND DREW A WHOLE ROOF HOLY FUCK NO WAY?! NOT EVEN A RULER?!?!?! HOLY SHIT.

Whats up with the shadow under the roof though? That's questionable lighting and geography. What the fuck is with that shadow jutting in from under the roof? Where is the sun supposed to be? What is causing that shadow? Is the building insanely shaped that way? That seems dumb.

And no fucking faces then? Just oil cloudscapes? Seriously why the fuck would you brag that a scape isn't traced? Why the fuck would a scape ever be traced? The entire beauty of scapes is that they don't HAVE to look like anything in particular. You're not recreating a famous person's fucking face m8 you're making clouds and you fucked up the house. Here, pic related was from hand, done at a bar with a few margarharitas. spoiler: nothing traced. spoiler: not impressive. spoiler: nobody traces scapes. spoiler: it's weird you didn't know that.

Oh and now I see you were greentexting what I said, but acting like a faggot, and doing it without greentext, for some reason. Seems weird.

Anyway not sure why you're so emotional about my work. Much less how you think you're of a level of skill or experience to talk half as much shit as you do. This corner of your inexplicably-lighted oil cloudscape seems like the perfect type of painting to put in picture frames for sale. Good for you buddy keep up the work. There's a demo for everything and you've got the depressed menopausal eastern european woman demographic locked up. Your issues with lighting and perspective will get better with practice I'm sure :)

>>3297419
Why would I be bored of it? I like painting weird faces. It's one of my favorite things. And more important than anything it's production at all. It's evidence that you're not a useless do-nothing. It's proof of life. Plus, when I do kill myself or die from misadventure it may skyrocket their value if I do it cool enough.

Also fuck you I painted a pissy sea scape at a bar last year. My talents are D I V E R S E.