/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6421591

>>6287326
i used to be excited for humanity expanding to the stars, but in the last 8 years or so, I've grown to want it remain stuck on this shithole as the sun swallows it whole, partly because of these dystopia loving bugmen. and it makes me happy to know that humanity will never leave this planet

>>6278150
that has nothing to do with what he said. are you the same retard I called out earlier on not knowing what a fucking "ad hominem" is? you keep spouting terms you don't understand, this is your average faggot who reads tech journalism to feel smart about himself

>>6264384
>sorry it doesn't work that way, you being intellectually deficient doesn't change that buddy.
because it's obvious that it is so, you street shitter
>artists are talentless bunch who can't make it in science and art are essentially completely worthless, end of the story.
that's funny, because normgroids and nose picking scum like you who browse ars technica every day always seem to claim that it's inherent talent that makes artists great, not skill. you're a dog brained retard
>who can't make it in science and art are essentially completely worthless, end of the story
most people don't want to make it into science. the global opinion on scientists has decreased quite a bit with the vaxx. i'd tread lightly if I were you. most "science" is hogwash that's not needed for humanity. only some of the base stuff like medicine and its requirements like electricity. the gimmicks, the quirks tech retards are trying to sell in our modern day tend to be useless unneeded garbage, and ironically enough that you've mentioned them, philosophers tend to point out how through technological advancement, we have made our lives more difficult instead of easier

>>6261468
>this is exactly why you'll lose in court. you have no idea how it works. you don't know what you're going against.
bugman thinks repeating "you don't know what you're talking about, you have no idea what's coming for you" thinks that this makes him seem knowledgeable on the subject. it reads like the tech hype crap you're subjecting yourself to daily. you have no idea what you're talking about, dipshit. comparing algorithms to the human brain.

>>6231204
that picture sucks, you defend it only because it was made by novel tech