/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3345109
Who am I gonna trust on composition some NGMI on /ic/ or the man himself Loomis?

>>3288295
This is why the Visual arts are fucked, people don't think structure is allowed. If a song had structure as sloppy as the state of current visual arts, we wouldn't even call it music.

>>3220313
Speaking of Loomis coming here to shit post, don't forget to plan your compositions you NGMI fags. Art without order is not art.

>>3212474
Loomis is a meme who believes in the pseudoscience that is called composition. Fundies clearly do not matter.

>>3210400
Loomis's own theory on composition.

I'm not saying you guys have to use dynamic symmetry and all it's mumbo jumbo magical powers, you can invent your own theories on composition like Loomis but at least plan that shit out beforehand.

>Anon1: Hey /ic/, anyone know how to become a master of figure drawing?
>Anon2: Loomis
>Anon3: Bruh, do you even Loomis? Bruh.
>Anon4: Loomis, you pleb.

>Anon1: Hey /ic/, anyone know how to become a master of composition?
>Anon2: You just have to do what looks right.
>Anon3: Just eyeball that shit.
>Anon4: There is no thing as composition, you might as well ask "what is art?"

Why does /ic/ refuse to acknowledge Loomis made a whole book on composition (called Creative Illustration)?