/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6616241
I don't know the answer to your question but in general you should be aware that AI art will never stop getting more popular. Until it's just seen as normal art like digital art is. People hated digital art at the beginning, too.

>>6615783
AI art is inherently more creative because it's "deriving" the art styles of basically everyone BUT THEN mixing them together in a literal infinite amount of ways. Something that would take mankind, should they attempt to do such a thing(which obviously doesn't happen), centuries to do. The easiest example to understand is mixing an anime model with a photorealistic model. You'll get an "anime artist if they real" effect depending on the ratio, and it will be a new style depending on how many distinct styles you're using.

And every single prompter is an artist. They all have their own tastes and represent that in their outputs. Most of them seem to have more of a defined style than anyone on /ic/ too. Because they're actually posting work that resembles a finished product.