/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3302884
>I think this kind of work only has potential if it is almost photorealistic.
I've thought about doing one where I try and go hard in the paint with the photorealism. My beefs are that I don't think I would be able to do it with Acrylic without going huge, and then it's just a time and focus thing that I probably don't have the capacity for. I've spent more time on >>3301489 than maybe any of them. And like I put a weird amount of time into >>3301481 this face. And they're both pretty small on 11x14s. And I used to do photorealistic stuff with chalk pastel in school.

I think if I put in the hours and acted with sober deliberation and purpose, pic related could become nigh-photorealistic. But I'd have to re-learn how to do art sober. And at that point I could have just printed the photo.