/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

I told you, yet you didn't want to listen.

>>6959845
>"it's an attack if it's offensive to a group of people and they feel offended, even if it's just someone calling a spade a spade Wow you must despise those people and think you're better."
And there you have it.
Nothing but emotional outbursts, irrationality, subjectivity and personal attacks.

When people get defensive and emotionally charged, that means they can't defend what they say and do in good faith that they have to brand the ones saying it how it is as
>"hating them or thinking they're lesser or not wanting them to be happy"
No matter how much drugs make you happy, they're still bad for you and any "defense" is just your addiction speaking to justify getting high.
Same with porn. Same with candy. Same with smoking. Same with anything you can't defend objectively.

>>6769727
>implying everyone on this board actually in an artist
Who do you think would be mad that artists would start demanding higher prices?
What kind of people would have a conflict of interests over this?
Artists wouldn't because it would directly benefit them, no matter where they're from.
3rd world people don't buy art, generally.

Although, it is the fault of 3rd world shitters why prices will become so low that it won't be worth to pursue art comms anymore, and ultimately it will fuck them over, too, because they will need to compete with each other through skill and pricing, until it won't be worth ever for them.
Coomers just want cheap stuff.