/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6633616
You do not understand because you clearly don't understand what a vanishing point is. How can you claim to understand when you don't understand the words being used?
Here is an example:
The road, trees, fence, etc. are all in the same plane(s) and share a vanishing point because of this. All horizontal vanishing points will be on the horizon line, which is always at the same elevation as eye level of the viewer. The lines making up the top and bottom of these objects will converge at the vanishing point. Note that for anything other than a plain box, the top and bottom plane are often just conceptual. Additionally, in the example picture, the artist chose to only give one horizontal vanishing point for these objects, the second set of lines making up the top and bottom plane are perfectly parallel, where instead they could converge at a secondary horizontal vanishing point.

>>5194454
Where did you hear that? It's true that if you place objects too far from the VP they get distorted, but it's still in 1VP. Also same type of distortion happens in two point perspective.
In many schools of art and design they literally teach you not to place the VP in middle of the image because it gives the image central symmetry which makes it look stale and boring.