/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6723109
Looks like no
The real answer for his action is because the data scrapping bots are overloading his servers

In this case, more power to him, I guess. It's just a business protecting itself
I am guessing that every single site will start doing this as well because server cost is not cheap, especially when hosting bots

What's are best IP to make fan arts of that can make me popular enough.

>inb4 vtuber's mobage, and pokemon
Too popular. I would just get flooded. I just want a niche that's small enough to stand out on but still big enough to make a name for myself

1. Elon already exposed that MUCH of social media activity comes from bot
His contract states that it is *around* 5% but research estimates real number is as much as 13%
What's more is that this number is not evenly distributed.
Before Elon got the contract, Twitter cleaned up their mess and I saw plenty of users whine about how they went from over 10000 followers to less than a few hundred.

2. Much of the people in social media are just doom scrolling neets who just wanted some quick dopamine fix.
Our comics once reached as much as a million views in reddit and yet not a single cent was donated. I am serious

That's really how worthless the internet points are

>>6514140
This is absolutely no different from selling traced images obtained from Google

It is not legal but no one would really call you out
No, everyone would just cringe over the fact that you think can fool people when there is a clear lack of understanding of fundies and have no artistic style

Authentic paintings are backd with enough confince that the artist can have his own style to express his emotion and sprinkle it with idealism