/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7143037
to add
The quality of womanhood, directly influences society.
So, if the women are low quality, men will not strive for more than that.

So, who is really at fault here? Women, simple as. It's always them.
Because, if men also don't comply and submit to low quality women behavior; they're incels and should be ostracized.

Now we have the majority of women who are simply trash and anyone who doesn't want to deal, excuse, support or justify their insanity is simply branded as a "defective male" and other women go along with it because they don't want to be socially excluded.

This is the exact same that happens in the art field:
You have a bunch of clout chasing clowns attentionwhoring or whoring themselves, destroying the ecosystem for their own gain which resulted in them inviting more grifters, cloutchasers and bots and onlyfans whores.
Why is the current payment processor thing going on? Because those same grifters that were invited by these cunts, fucked shit up for everyone else in pursuit of their own gain.

>>6635633
>how do you explain men leaving women at way higher rates when their partner has a live threatening condition? why are women more likely to stay? men are the actual sociopaths.
I doubt one study of 515 patients can tell anything about the total state of half of the population.

Shit bait.
>>6635764
>Men convinced women to enter these spaces
It was "feminism", which basically were some bitter cunts being paid by hyper-capitalistic pigs to force women into the work force so they could lower wages all across and have a steady supply of cheap workers and drive up competition to further enable shitty work practices.

Women could literally sit at home and take care of their kids or do whatever they wanted, while the men went working and could feed an entire family with their paychecks.
The only demerit was that they were dependent on the man bringing the money home, but times were good where if you worked your ass off, you could actually achieve something.
Now work is all exploitation and the behavior of modern women reflects the state of society as a whole.

Men gained absolutely nothing from it, except a further devaluation of their existence. Men were always disposable.
>workplace pussy
Those who get the workplace pussy are also those who run the very big companies.
The average male gained nothing from it and throughout the human existence, males rarely passed on their genes i.e. got laid.
It is normal that only 20% of the male population ever get any pussy.

>>5111707
Not putting "femininity" in a box.
I am simply listing reasons why i think females are disgusting atrocities.
>in what way AM I guilty?
>Go read Mishima and Evola at least and instead of greentext copypastas, for fucks sake.
The need for you to defend yourself over nothing and try to prove this desperately that you are "educated" shows you're inferiority complex.
There is nothing wrong with easy and digestable bites of knowledge.
Or do you expect me to write book analysis so you can tell yourself that you're surrounded by smart people thus satiating your miserable need to validate your own intelligence?
Just fucking use your head, faggot