/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3768714
>sketch
>technology
>based on random google result
pass

>>3732618
>you started this thread confident that you could argue that enything is art
no the opposite of that. What even is confidence? Like what IS art? What isn't? What's the line?
>and even though I defined art for you precisely in the 4th post,
is the internet art? Is telecommunication art? Are memes art? Can literal trash not evoke a recognition of aesthetics in the form of insight, inspiration, and a deep sense of communication? So cable news is art?
> you're holding on to your inital conviction and treading water trying to evade my definition.
I had a lot of questions that I directly axed. How are you not evading rite meow?
>I've answered every single question you've asked in my first post.
And then instead of responding to the follow up questions, you've pivoted to a meta-critique about the conversation you're refusing to have.
> I don't know if you are evading or just legitimately too stupid to understand.
So ART IS COMMUNICATION? Does that mean that ALL communication is art?

OF

>>3603054
Not to mention
>good for you for being very dedicated towards your growth it's really admirable
this is essentially the same thing as saying "I like your work."